LAHA Lifestyle: Weed Remediation Update

The LAHA Legislative Committee has been looking into the lake situation.

Currently talking with a consulting and engineering company that specializes in these kind of projects
Second opinion will also be gathered in the next 4-6 weeks

Consultant recommended that the Walled Lake and Shawood Lake initiatives be put on separate but equal paths:

Walled Lake and Shawood Lake are different bio-scapes: Different stages in their lives, different aquatic plants, different treatments, one city
No current volunteers from Shawood Lake for the Legislative Committee or to drive the weed remediation initiative
Member residents of Shawood encouraged to volunteer for the committee
Volunteers solicited during meeting (no representatives have yet stepped forward)
Board reached out to attendees with connections to Shawood Lake residents to encourage more participation
LAHA Board desires to get Shawood Lake momentum going as soon as possible, in parallel with the Walled Lake push

Weed Remediation Options for Walled Lake:

Environmentally-approved chemical treatment option being reviewed
Consists of 3 components: Conditions study, initial treatment, and subsequent annual treatments
Cost: approximately $14,000 for the study, $68,000 for Year 1, $23,000 for subsequent years
Weed harvesting explored: Annual cost is similar to annual treatment above, the invasive weed in Walled Lake (milfoil) is reported to reseed aggressively when harvested (committee volunteers to confirm this report)
Seeding the lake with weed-eating insects suggested as another possible option (committee volunteers to research and report back)
Novi weed pick-up: Novi elected to privatize all city services (that’s why there is no garbage pickup); to do weed pick up over the long-term would require another city contract (not budgeted) - As a short-term solution, the City of Novi will revisit the investment required to provide such a service

Framing the issue for Walled Lake:

No longer a key stormwater basin for Novi: Primary growth in the last two decades for the City of Novi has occurred south of Walled Lake; considerable drainage improvements have been gained from those new developments easing the reliance on some previous stormwater basins (including Walled Lake); the core density for Novi is now south of the Walled Lake area; Meadowbrook and Village Oaks lake deterioration were creating flooding issues in streets and other neighborhoods – infrastructure damage and potential liability that had to be addressed (dredging of those lakes represented the city’s first investment in those lakes in 20 years)
Cities do not own the lakes (the State of Michigan is technically responsible but economically unable to address all of the state’s lake maintenance)
Events on the lake: Currently funded, primarily, by a private businessman in the city of Walled Lake; represents a considerable marketing expense that elevates the profile of the city and enhances the value of its properties and businesses (Novi's only event is a parks and rec event - the triathalon)
There is no legal obligation for cities to maintain the lake
There is no budget available (especially now as city revenues are under even more pressure)
Even if LAHA was able to privately finance the treatment, we have no legal grounds to treat the lake

Lake Board again under consideration – the differences:

Narrowly scoped mission - sole focus is on invasive, aquatic plants (not mooring, or access, or geese, etc.)
Based on “benefit”, measured in units: lakefront owner, lakefront separated by street, backlot, businesses, municipalities would all be assessed a percentage of a unit based on benefit
Two ways to set up: 2/3rds approval of all lakefront and backlot owners or City Council resolution (we will be pursuing the latter)

Legally, the long-term oversight of a Lake Board can not be explicitly limited, HOWEVER:

Expansion in this case is highly unlikely given the Board composition of a City of Walled Lake representative, a City of Novi representative, Oakland County representation, and a lake property owner representative – all would have to agree
In the consultant’s experience, only two Lake Boards in Michigan expanded their scope - out of more than 100 that have been formed (neither case dealt with the additional complexity of dual-city representation)
The Board would need to clear public hearings to proceed with an expansion of powers

Informal conversations in mid-July with city officials

Willingness to help in any way they can: information and guidance
Willingness to take on their fair share of the burden in a Special Assessment District (TBD by the Lake Board) - Study determines/recommends assessments with city data
Willingness to provide their support in setting up the Lake Board upon 51% of lakefront and backlot owners signing a petition resolving to the cities to set up the Lake Board

Estimated cost:

Assuming 500 homes (conservative)
$200 for the first year and study (approximately $17/month during the first year)
$100 for subsequent years (approximately $8/month)
Actual recommendations on assessments will be determined during the upfront study

Timing

LAHA Review of Petition Resolution for the City Councils of Walled Lake and Novi

Draft petition resolution shared with attending LAHA members at meeting on July 22nd
95% of attending members voted in support of the Petition resolution
Petition resolution to be presented to each City Council during early August City Council meetings

Questions and Further Discussion

LAHA is eager to provide as much transparency throughout this process as possible
Please forward any questions or concerns to the LAHA officers at the email addresses provided at http://www.lahalifestyle.com/
Use the website to initiate additional conversation among members

Pages